after five long years, the jodi arias trial came to a climatic end with a guilty verdict for murder in the first degree. as i discussed in past blogs, arias was not insane or incompetent or a battered woman. the dsm iv, with all of its 365 diagnoses, does not explain ariasâs behavior and there is no one or no circumstance left to blame other than jodi herself. hereâs the simple analysis: arias was a spoiled, selfish brat, unable to handle alexander’s rejection. typically, this disorder or that disorder is not the reason for an evil act. while one would think that the severity of the verdict would have her doing a bit of soul-searching and self-contemplation, she remains defiant. soon after that, unbelievably, she was in front of a ksaz phoenix camera and gave an exclusive interview.
arias admitted she is disliked (the ultimate understatement) by many, but also defiantly stated, “a psychologist once explained to me that society has this need to persecute people. she ignores the severity and cruelty of her actions to the end. meanwhile, she still blames others and is still defiant, while continuing to drag alexander’s name through the mud, even though a jury of her peers (and an overwhelming majority of the public) don’t believe a word she says. but, with the way arias operates, is this just one more manipulation and a bit of reverse psychology? arias’ television interview will be allowed, and certainly martinez will use her own words and urge the jury to grant arias her wish, potentially paving the way for a lethal injection. arias will never show remorse for killing another human, will never say a kind word to alexander’s family, will remain defiant and in denial to the end. there are many temptations to organize our life around the experience of earlier trauma.
phoenix — jodi arias lied repeatedly during an evaluation conducted by a psychologist hired by the defense, who diagnosed her with amnesia and post-traumatic stress disorder, but most of the falsities were irrelevant to his ultimate conclusions about her mental state, the expert testified tuesday at arias’ murder trial. authorities say she planned the attack in a jealous rage. psychologist richard samuels concluded his third day of testimony tuesday after telling jurors that he diagnosed arias with ptsd and dissociative amnesia, which explains why she can’t remember much from the day she killed alexander. prosecutor juan martinez seized on multiple lies arias told samuels throughout the process of his evaluation, at one point getting the psychologist to acknowledge he should have re-administered at least one test he used to come to his ptsd diagnosis. martinez then again questioned arias’ repeated lies to samuels, and asked how he could conduct a conclusive evaluation of the defendant without truthful answers.
martinez noted that at the time of at least one test administered by samuels, arias was sticking to her story that intruders killed alexander. “it’s not critical to the outcome of the test.” on monday, martinez questioned samuels’ credibility, accusing him of blurring the line between objective observer and therapist when he bought arias a self-help book about building self-esteem. arias spent 18 days on the witness stand during which she described her abusive childhood, cheating boyfriends, dead-end jobs, a shocking sexual relationship with alexander, and her contention that he had grown physically abusive in the months leading to his death. she said she recalls alexander attacking her in a fury and said she ran into his closet to retrieve a gun he kept on a shelf and fired in self-defense but has no memory of stabbing him. she has acknowledged trying to clean the scene of the killing, dumping the gun in the desert and leaving the victim a voicemail on his cellphone hours later in an attempt to avoid suspicion. since the trial began, none of arias’ allegations of alexander’s violence, that he owned a gun and had sexual desires for young boys, has been corroborated by witnesses or evidence.
she did not suffer from ptsd, nor borderline personality disorder, nor was she a sociopath. the dsm iv, with all of its 365 diagnoses, does not she suffers from borderline personality disorder (bpd). indeed, arias is the poster child for the disorder. let’s put it this way: if arias is not bpd, then no jodi arias: psychological diagnosis by dr. paul dawson reveals exciting new insights and analyses of the jodi arias murder case. based on his background as, jodi arias iq, jodi arias iq, jodi arias freak, jodi arias now, jodi arias father cause of death.
she has been u201cdiagnosedu201d as narcissistic, a pathological liar, bipolar and a sociopath (which i discuss in a recent post). but, the most popular lay diagnosis recently is borderline personality disorder (bpd). arias is not the only high profile individual with the bpd label. associating those terrible things with mental disorders psychologist richard samuels concluded his third day of testimony tuesday after telling jurors that he diagnosed arias with ptsd and demarte was called by the prosecution to discredit defense experts who diagnosed arias with ptsd, amnesia and battered woman’s syndrome, which, borderline personality disorder, jodi arias’ parents, jodi arias bpd reddit, jodi arias interview 2021, jodi arias 2021 pics, jodi arias’ parents interview, jodi arias inmate number, jodi arias education, jodi arias sentence, jodi arias confession.
When you try to get related information on jodi arias psychiatric diagnosis, you may look for related areas. jodi arias iq, jodi arias freak, jodi arias now, jodi arias father cause of death, borderline personality disorder, jodi arias’ parents, jodi arias bpd reddit, jodi arias interview 2021, jodi arias 2021 pics, jodi arias’ parents interview, jodi arias inmate number, jodi arias education, jodi arias sentence, jodi arias confession.